Tuesday, December 07, 2010

Enter The Egghead

I bet you didn't know you're reading an object of scientific fascination right now, did you? That at this very moment your eyes are set upon a subject of learned minds seeking insight into the ways of the world, thirsty for knowledge and understanding, searching for a key to unlock a bit of the vast unknown that surrounds us in a blanket of ignorance.

I'm not kidding you. This is a real study that appeared in a real scientific journal:

Purpose. The characteristics of pharmacist blogs were examined.
Methods. Internet search engines, blog aggregators, and blog rolls were used to identify pharmacist blogs. Six categories were developed to evaluate blogs, including practice-based topics, identifying information, positive language, critical language, professionalism, and miscellaneous. The most recent five posts on each pharmacist blog were reviewed. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the results.

I don't know if this project was funded. I do know that someone out there, three people actually, according to the author credits, thought this was the best use of their time. Since they sunk what I'm willing to bet was a fair amount of it into this, why don't we go ahead and see what the great minds of the profession were able to learn:

The most popular pharmacist blog in our study, with a Technorati authority score of 118 (as of January 2010), was “Your Pharmacist May Hate You."

As the kids would say, Woot!

"Blogs containing posts with language of a positive nature were less frequently indexed (32%) compared with those with critical language (57%). Overall, pharmacist bloggers in the community pharmacy setting accounted for 60% of all instances of critical language recorded."

"Community-based pharmacists were observed to write posts with unprofessional language more frequently (n = 15) than were noncommunity practitioners (n = 6)."

"Curiously, the only two pharmacist blogs ranked by Technorati not primarily characterized as “ranting” (i.e., “Science-Based Pharmacy” and “Prescribing Advice for GPs”) are authored by pharmacists outside the United States."

"there was also a troubling amount of pessimism in some of the most widely read blogs."

So what do the eggheads make of all this?

This finding raises several questions.What significance can be ascribed to “The Angry Pharmacist” and “The Angriest Pharmacist” being among the most influential and viewed pharmacist blogs? What is the impetus for such widespread vitriol? Is it a reflection of a plunging job satisfaction rate in the community sector...

Gasp! Could it be? Retail pharmacists not happy with working at a breakneck pace for 12 hours at a time with 5 people demanding their immediate attention, three of which who want to know where the bread is? My God! Who had any idea? We should fund more studies to find out what effect giving away a bag of dog food with every flu shot might have on professional satisfaction. I mean, could earning a Doctor of Pharmacy degree after 6 years of grueling academic labor and tuition payments so one can work a drive through window lead to....low job satisfaction?

There's just so much to learn. A Universe of unknowns.....

Here's the olive in the martini:

Whether such blogs actually reflect the current state of practice anywhere is debatable

So.....not only did these people not have a the slightest grip on the obvious going into this, even after unearthing more than a little evidence....they're just not sure....

And they say academics are out of touch.

I have a better idea for your next project professor. Instead of hiding behind computer screens and number crunching calculators at the library for months on end, why don't you just go on down to your local Walgreen's and put in half a days work, assuming you have a license to practice pharmacy that is. You do that and I'll betcha your next little article will have a headline something like, "ALL PEOPLE SUCK PENIS"

You're also far more likely to come back with a clue than you ever will be writing bullshit like this. Take it from me, author of the most popular pharmacist blog in your study. The only thing you've managed to prove is that you have no fucking idea.

12 comments:

Anonymous said...

DrugMonkey, to be fair, AJHP is a journal for HOSPITAL pharmacists. Why would they know (or even care) what goes on in retail? Do you pay attention to issues in hospital practice?

Anonymous said...

Wow...they have a study for everything! I wish I had the capability to be so clueless, it sounds like a fun job...reading pharmacy blogs all day! :)

I knew you'd be the winner--you are AWESOME! Now I definitely have to get your book! You should use that as a selling point!

Loved that you chose Walgreen's! Last week was my last week there! WOOHOO!! Now at an independent, with lots of staffing and so much less stress!! Maybe I won't need your book afterall.... ;)

JacRabbit said...

DM,

While their findings were a bit obvious and their lack of conviction disappointing, I think you should be congratulated that you were scientifically proven to be the best at something.

Anonymous said...

So I followed your link, and since I'm not a member of ASHP, they wanted money to read this Earth-shattering research paper.

Since they wanted money from me, did they give money to you to quote any part of your blog?

Fair use be damned, DM, they were only hitching their wagon to your star in order to make themselves look better.

Anonymous said...

Seriously? One of the authors also did important works "Scope, Completeness, and Accuracy of Drug Information in Wikipedia" and "Safety issues associated with commercially available energy drinks"

Heavy stuff, Drugmonkey. I cannot fault their finding as far as the most popular pharmacist blog.

Anonymous said...

Send the study authors to a Wal-Mart pharmacy, and they'll become clinically insane within half an hour. Doesn't matter if they actually work in the pharmacy, waiting in line to pick up a refill you called in the previous day is enough to drive most people batty. Or, stick them on the drive-thru with catheters "because pharmacists aren't allowed to go to the bathroom", y'know.

The Redheaded Pharmacist said...

The name Kevin Clauson from that study's abstract rings a bell. Isn't he the same guy who had some quotes in the October 2010 issue of Drugstore Canada magazine in their article on the subject of pharmacists and the use of social media? He's the guy that while talking about pharmacy blogs said an "unsettling high number involve ranting and unprofessional language that doesn't present the profession in the best light." Am I right on this DM, is that the same FL professor? Just wondering because if it is the same guy it explains a lot about the modivation behind this study in my mind.

Mildly Irritated Pharmacist said...

Wow. I am blown away.

I have the good fortune of working at a retail pharmacy with good staffing (most of the time) and reasonable hours (on most weeks).

Still, it never ceases to amaze me how academia and hospital pharmacy are clueless about the reality of the profession today.

I had a professor (a hospital-based one, of course) talk to us about 'opiophobia', even though opiate prescriptions and abuse have skyrocketed in the last 15 years. We don't live in some magical world where people angry about their pain meds are just suffering from uncontrolled pain. We live in a world where seemingly healthy people with no physical signs of pain present to the pharmacy with a prescription for OxyContin 80mg QID.

Maybe there's a reason our tone isn't professional. Maybe it's because we live in a world where patients have no obligation to be professional to us. They yell, cry and scream at us because some insurance we have no control over raised their co-pay by $5. I had a guy go beserk in the drive-through over waiting for a Vicodin prescription. We had it done in 8 minutes. During rush hour.

So, in my most professional tone, I say to academic pharmacy: Fuck you. And fuck all the people who have made our profession into being a low level DEA agent.

Từ Thanh Giác said...

When I worked at Bigelow's Pharmacy in NYC, while going to pharmacy school, the Dean of Columbia College School of Pharmacy worked as a pharmacist on Sundays to keep is hand in the profession. No wonder Columbia shut down their School of Pharmacy.

Unknown said...

Just read this article in AJHP, which I still subscribe to in hopes that I will be able to buy my soul back from the "W" in three years. The article was written by an associate professor and two students from Nova Southeastern University in Florida. Chances are the associate faculty is fresh from some idealistic residency, and of course the students have not been responsible for the madness of a retail pharmacy, ever. Vitriol is the after-taste of the waking nightmare that retail pharmacy has become. It pays well, but quite frankly so does stripping. And when I am gathering up the sweaty dollars that are thrown at me by my medicaid patients, it sort of feels that way. Suck on that image Kevin A Clauson.

Kevin Clauson said...

Drug Monkey,

We decided to examine the state of the pharmacist blogosphere for a few reasons. Two of them included that: 1) varying types of social media represent important modes of communication and 2) the previous study on blogs "written by health professionals" [JGIM 2008;23(10):1642-6.] only included physicians and nurses - not pharmacists.

I support our assertion in the article that both rants and discourse in blogs may serve as a tool for the profession in identifying areas for improvement and as an early warning system. Much of what we wrote at that time is still reflected in current pharmacist blogs, the recent trend towards less ranting and more issues/solutions based writing notwithstanding.

If you have any direct questions, I would be happy to try and address them.

Kevin

DrugMonkey, Master of Pharmacy said...

Kevin,

Questions? Nope. You actually illustrate my point with your comment just about as well as I can. Thanks for checking in.....